|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Mar 5, 2017 18:03:05 GMT -5
Hi Mouse, A normal person whether man or woman don't harass people in broad daylight by exposing their sexual organs. It's absolutely crazy. If a cop had seen him he would have been charged with indecent exposure. what are you talking about..sexual appitite is not about harassing people in the street or exposing themselves and those with an energetic sexual are not necessarily pervs.. enjoying sex is not perv induced...neither is having sexual partners .... .you do dwell on the seamy side ..no wonder you have some rather strange ideas Hi Mouse, I think you have got your wires crossed.!!! It is people who indulge in sexual activity outside of marriage that dwell on the seamy side. We are not living back in primitive times when women were dragged by the hair caveman style whenever a man had the urge. I'm surprised that you should think that way.!!!
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 6, 2017 3:49:26 GMT -5
that's because we live and have lived in a male dominated society and women indulging in sexual activity are to a great extent not looked down on so much these days ...and the word slut goes beyond sexual activity The only time I have heard the word slut used was in reference to the sexual activity of an unmarried (usually) female who has many casual sexual encounters. I would differ ..times have changed and women do not get looked down on as much imo look at slebs ..film and TV stars etc they are not termed sluts...yet they have multiple partners eg..Princess Dianna is one..the late Elizabeth Taylor example being just two we would all know the names of of the women who are termed sluts are those whose behaviour goes beyond mere sexual activity to all out promiscuity [am trying to think of an example known on both sides of the pond..but cannot come up with a name ...
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 6, 2017 4:03:22 GMT -5
what are you talking about..sexual appitite is not about harassing people in the street or exposing themselves and those with an energetic sexual are not necessarily pervs.. enjoying sex is not perv induced...neither is having sexual partners .... .you do dwell on the seamy side ..no wonder you have some rather strange ideas Hi Mouse, I think you have got your wires crossed.!!! It is people who indulge in sexual activity outside of marriage that dwell on the seamy side. We are not living back in primitive times when women were dragged by the hair caveman style whenever a man had the urge. I'm surprised that you should think that way.!!! ah yes sex outside marriage..that is a religious construct from the three Abrahamic religions and part and parcel of patriarchal societies....an enforced societal system not natural to human beings and certainly not world wide behaviour """""We are not living back in primitive times when women were dragged by the hair caveman style whenever a man had the urge""" it may come as a shock to you..but women can actually be willing partners with their own urges in a sexual relationship with absolutely no reason for anyone to drag them any way...and sexual activity is not just about sex many other factors come into play not all men are the seamy side perves you seem to have come across which do appear to have given you some very strange ideas
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 6, 2017 4:15:09 GMT -5
who said it was only men who do that sort of thing..and even the most energetic of men can be gentle men just as the most energetic of women can be ladies... sex is an appitite built into us to sustain the species just as the need food and water is to sustain life ....all life forms need food and water and all life form need to reproduce ..pollination ..production of seeds ..birth or flowering ..a time to live a time to flower and a time to die Hi Mouse, I know all about the birds and the bees, but I always thought that you didn't indulge yourself as they do, so it is a different kettle of fish. Sex is for marriage with responsibility part of the arrangement. I don't go looking for trouble. As a child, I was obedient to my parents, as even then, I had the intelligence to know that my parents knew more about life than I did, and because they loved me, were always going to steer me in the right direction with their sound advice, which I followed.!!! """"I always thought that you didn't indulge yourself as they do,""" I assume the ""they""" are men ? but don't see what you as a child has to do with the subject but your idea that sex is for marriage is a false man made construct...sex is for one reason alone..and that is reproduction .. and luckily sexual activity is also enjoyable for humans with the right partner the reasons for marriage..handfasting..partnerships..unions etc is a wholly different conversation and a social/societal construct compiled by man/mankind
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Mar 6, 2017 6:57:31 GMT -5
Hearsay isn't exactly evidence of anything, is it. Hi Fretslider, we are not in Court speaking from the witness box, loosen up.!!! You're just making flippant misandrist claims based on nothing more than Chinese whispers.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Mar 6, 2017 7:22:27 GMT -5
Hi Mouse, I think you have got your wires crossed.!!! It is people who indulge in sexual activity outside of marriage that dwell on the seamy side. We are not living back in primitive times when women were dragged by the hair caveman style whenever a man had the urge. I'm surprised that you should think that way.!!! ah yes sex outside marriage..that is a religious construct from the three Abrahamic religions and part and parcel of patriarchal societies....an enforced societal system not natural to human beings and certainly not world wide behaviour """""We are not living back in primitive times when women were dragged by the hair caveman style whenever a man had the urge""" it may come as a shock to you..but women can actually be willing partners with their own urges in a sexual relationship with absolutely no reason for anyone to drag them any way...and sexual activity is not just about sex many other factors come into play not all men are the seamy side perves you seem to have come across which do appear to have given you some very strange ideas Hi Mouse, I thought marriage was the norm? Does that mean you are not married?
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Mar 6, 2017 7:29:13 GMT -5
Hi Fretslider, we are not in Court speaking from the witness box, loosen up.!!! You're just making flippant misandrist claims based on nothing more than Chinese whispers. Hi Fretslider, My remarks may be flippant, but they are made in fun. Loosen up.!!!
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Mar 6, 2017 7:48:23 GMT -5
Hi Mouse, I know all about the birds and the bees, but I always thought that you didn't indulge yourself as they do, so it is a different kettle of fish. Sex is for marriage with responsibility part of the arrangement. I don't go looking for trouble. As a child, I was obedient to my parents, as even then, I had the intelligence to know that my parents knew more about life than I did, and because they loved me, were always going to steer me in the right direction with their sound advice, which I followed.!!! """"I always thought that you didn't indulge yourself as they do,""" I assume the ""they""" are men ? but don't see what you as a child has to do with the subject but your idea that sex is for marriage is a false man made construct...sex is for one reason alone..and that is reproduction .. and luckily sexual activity is also enjoyable for humans with the right partner the reasons for marriage..handfasting..partnerships..unions etc is a wholly different conversation and a social/societal construct compiled by man/mankind Hi mouse, I meant the way of the birds and the bees and wild animals who don't need to be married, I was brought up by Christian parents which ofcourse is responsible for my outlook on life and my expectations as to behaviour. It seems that we live in the same world but see it differently.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Mar 6, 2017 8:04:30 GMT -5
The only time I have heard the word slut used was in reference to the sexual activity of an unmarried (usually) female who has many casual sexual encounters. I would differ ..times have changed and women do not get looked down on as much imo look at slebs ..film and TV stars etc they are not termed sluts...yet they have multiple partners eg..Princess Dianna is one..the late Elizabeth Taylor example being just two we would all know the names of of the women who are termed sluts are those whose behaviour goes beyond mere sexual activity to all out promiscuity [am trying to think of an example known on both sides of the pond..but cannot come up with a name ... Hi Mouse, Are you trying to tell me that the men who boast about how many women they have laid ( their expressions ) are not promiscuous, which ofcourse means that the women must be promiscuous also. I'm glad that I haven't been part of that kind of behaviour.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 6, 2017 8:12:10 GMT -5
ah yes sex outside marriage..that is a religious construct from the three Abrahamic religions and part and parcel of patriarchal societies....an enforced societal system not natural to human beings and certainly not world wide behaviour """""We are not living back in primitive times when women were dragged by the hair caveman style whenever a man had the urge""" it may come as a shock to you..but women can actually be willing partners with their own urges in a sexual relationship with absolutely no reason for anyone to drag them any way...and sexual activity is not just about sex many other factors come into play not all men are the seamy side perves you seem to have come across which do appear to have given you some very strange ideas Hi Mouse, I thought marriage was the norm? Does that mean you are not married? no i am not married we divorced and of course ive had relationships since then....but never bothered to remarry [by choice] I never felt the need if you check the statistics FOR THE uk more people have relationships both long and short with out marriage than do actually marry ..and church marriages are on the decline .. relationships including marriage are based on other factors such as companionship..family even economic necessity..children etc and not based solely on sex
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 6, 2017 8:14:31 GMT -5
""""I always thought that you didn't indulge yourself as they do,""" I assume the ""they""" are men ? but don't see what you as a child has to do with the subject but your idea that sex is for marriage is a false man made construct...sex is for one reason alone..and that is reproduction .. and luckily sexual activity is also enjoyable for humans with the right partner the reasons for marriage..handfasting..partnerships..unions etc is a wholly different conversation and a social/societal construct compiled by man/mankind Hi mouse, I meant the way of the birds and the bees and wild animals who don't need to be married, I was brought up by Christian parents which ofcourse is responsible for my outlook on life and my expectations as to behaviour. It seems that we live in the same world but see it differently. we have lived very different lives..well totally different lives ..I too as brought up in a Christian household which has influenced the way I see things
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 6, 2017 8:22:58 GMT -5
I would differ ..times have changed and women do not get looked down on as much imo look at slebs ..film and TV stars etc they are not termed sluts...yet they have multiple partners eg..Princess Dianna is one..the late Elizabeth Taylor example being just two we would all know the names of of the women who are termed sluts are those whose behaviour goes beyond mere sexual activity to all out promiscuity [am trying to think of an example known on both sides of the pond..but cannot come up with a name ... Hi Mouse, Are you trying to tell me that the men who boast about how many women they have laid ( their expressions ) are not promiscuous, which ofcourse means that the women must be promiscuous also. cI'm glad that I haven't been part of that kind of behaviour. theres a lot of boasting going on with both men and women when it comes to sexual experience..it all comes down to the individual as to whether they can be considered promicuios or not..the way they gather sexual partners and if its all about the sexual immediate gratification ..one night stands .meaningless.casual link ups etc etc relationships are not one night stands or just about the sex..some times they last..some times they don't I really don't know why you say"""" I'm glad that I haven't been part of that kind of behaviour"""because you have nothing to mesure by so really cannot judge on face value
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Mar 6, 2017 15:31:57 GMT -5
You're just making flippant misandrist claims based on nothing more than Chinese whispers. Hi Fretslider, My remarks may be flippant, but they are made in fun. Loosen up.!!! You could loosen up by talking to a few men, you might even be surprised.
|
|