|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 20, 2017 7:00:09 GMT -5
You seem to be putting Abraham, Moses, Jesus on a pedestal, so if we are all just Human beings, then it is not warranted. I don't put them on any sort of pedestal...but the first two are seen as the founders of Judaism and Islam and Jesus as the founder of Christianity.. thus all three are respected figures of those who follow the words and deeds Abraham the founder of his people [Jewish] and via Ishmael [islam] Moses led his people away from Egypt Jesus founded an entire world wide faith religion following [knowledge of him was right around Europe in less than 30 yrs] Twitchel very few people have heard of him after 70 yrs Regardless of that, the end of the World hasn't happened yet. By that time all people will believe the truth of ECKANKAR. Even now there is already talk that Jesus never existed and that supposition is being debated between scholars, some are even saying that the Bible is fiction.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Oct 20, 2017 7:06:35 GMT -5
I still think that you have misconstrued what I said. Nope.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Oct 20, 2017 7:07:02 GMT -5
Soul is an artificial construct. As well you know. I know nothing of the kind.!!! I KNOW that I AM Soul We know full well what you are.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Oct 20, 2017 7:07:54 GMT -5
Do we really have to go over it again? You claimed all animals - all animals - have soul This is patently false as soul, or consciousness is only apparent in higher animals such a mammals. Lower orders such as sponges, jellyfish, insects etc etc are not self aware. They have rudimetanry ganglia - clumps of nerve cells - not brains. Then you said that it was not imporatnt. These are facts. Can you prove otherwise? These creatures also evolve. All life evolves. Not all life is self-aware.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Oct 20, 2017 7:09:52 GMT -5
"""ven now there is already talk that Jesus never existed and that supposition is being debated between scholars, some are even saying that the Bible is fiction"""
the Bible actually is a book of translations many many translation a brilliant piece of translation by William Tindale/all from the Greek into English.... and that translation did more fore education than any thing before or since.. as so many wanted to read the Bible for them selves... along with the English prayer book of course there were those who were furious that the Bible had been translated into the common tongue.. it took power away from the churches and left the priests quite vunerable to questioning.. even Henry the 8th considered it a step too far....
and as with any thing once it vecomes every day it looses its mystque
The Catholic Douay-Rheims version of the whole Bible in English was translated from the Latin Vulgate. It was completed in 1610, one year before the King James Version was published. The New Testament had been published in 1582 and was one of the sources used by the KJV translators.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 20, 2017 7:25:24 GMT -5
These creatures also evolve. All life evolves. Not all life is self-aware. These creatures have to be aware of something and that is what Soul is: a unit of awareness. I don't, believe that I used the term self aware.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Oct 21, 2017 4:07:53 GMT -5
All life evolves. Not all life is self-aware. These creatures have to be aware of something and that is what Soul is: a unit of awareness. I don't, believe that I used the term self aware. Why, because you say they have to be aware? Soul is the principle of life, feeling, thought, and action in humans, regarded as a distinct entity separate from the body, and commonly held to be separable in existence from the body; the spiritual part of humans as distinct from the physical part. You can stretch that to animals that have consciousness and self-awareness - higher animals. Don't try to tell me that a sponge (an animal of the phylum Porifera) is self-aware, conscious or has a soul.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 22, 2017 16:53:40 GMT -5
A MAN has been arrested after claiming to be a time traveller from 2048 sent back to warn people about a 2018 alien invasion. Officers in Casper, Wyoming, said the Bryant Johnson, from central Wyoming, in the US, was arrested for public intoxication. Casper police said the man they encountered at 10.30pm on Monday claimed he was from the year 2048. The suspect told police he wanted to warn the people of Casper that aliens will arrive next year, and that they should leave as soon as possible. He asked to speak to the "president" of the town, about 170 miles (270 kilometres) northwest of Cheyenne. According to police, the man told them he was only able to time travel because aliens filled his body with alcohol. He said that the plan had gone wrong and he was supposed to be transported back to 2018, not 2017. Police said he smelt of alcohol, and spoke with slightly slurred speech, but he said to them: “The aliens were coming next year and we needed to make sure to leave as fast as possible.” Officers did not believe the man's claims and arrested him as a drunk. www.express.co.uk/news/weird/863223/time-traveller-2048-aliens-invasion-ufo-2018Makes a change from seeing god I suppose. His clothing might have been a giveaway, still it might be Jesus returning at long last to rule for a thousand years?
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 22, 2017 23:35:55 GMT -5
I know nothing of the kind.!!! I KNOW that I AM Soul We know full well what you are. For the fun of it, pray tell.!!!
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 22, 2017 23:51:33 GMT -5
"""ven now there is already talk that Jesus never existed and that supposition is being debated between scholars, some are even saying that the Bible is fiction""" the Bible actually is a book of translations many many translation a brilliant piece of translation by William Tindale/all from the Greek into English.... and that translation did more fore education than any thing before or since.. as so many wanted to read the Bible for them selves... along with the English prayer book of course there were those who were furious that the Bible had been translated into the common tongue.. it took power away from the churches and left the priests quite vunerable to questioning.. even Henry the 8th considered it a step too far.... and as with any thing once it becomes every day it looses its mystque The Catholic Douay-Rheims version of the whole Bible in English was translated from the Latin Vulgate. It was completed in 1610, one year before the King James Version was published. The New Testament had been published in 1582 and was one of the sources used by the KJV translators. It seems that I AM irritated by the word loose especially when it is used in the wrong context. Looses should ofcourse have been loses.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Oct 23, 2017 7:17:42 GMT -5
We know full well what you are. For the fun of it, pray tell.!!! Delusional. You did ask.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Oct 24, 2017 5:54:01 GMT -5
"""ven now there is already talk that Jesus never existed and that supposition is being debated between scholars, some are even saying that the Bible is fiction""" the Bible actually is a book of translations many many translation a brilliant piece of translation by William Tindale/all from the Greek into English.... and that translation did more fore education than any thing before or since.. as so many wanted to read the Bible for them selves... along with the English prayer book of course there were those who were furious that the Bible had been translated into the common tongue.. it took power away from the churches and left the priests quite vunerable to questioning.. even Henry the 8th considered it a step too far.... and as with any thing once it becomes every day it looses its mystque The Catholic Douay-Rheims version of the whole Bible in English was translated from the Latin Vulgate. It was completed in 1610, one year before the King James Version was published. The New Testament had been published in 1582 and was one of the sources used by the KJV translators. It seems that I AM irritated by the word loose especially when it is used in the wrong context. Looses should ofcourse have been loses. what ever...note to self[for future reference].. spelling is more important than content
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 24, 2017 7:09:42 GMT -5
It seems that I AM irritated by the word loose especially when it is used in the wrong context. Looses should ofcourse have been loses. what ever...note to self[for future reference].. spelling is more important than content You seem to be making a habit of putting words in my mouth. I did not suggest that spelling is more important than content. I did however say that the word loose instead of lose does irritate me.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Oct 24, 2017 7:12:30 GMT -5
For the fun of it, pray tell.!!! Delusional. You did ask. Think what you like!!!
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Oct 24, 2017 7:53:19 GMT -5
|
|