|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Aug 4, 2017 4:32:28 GMT -5
I could possible be a picture on an old camera, ie one with a film in it which has been double exposed. Certainly looks odd though. that's exactly the conclusion I came too.. a double exposure Hi Mouse, so what about the first photo? There was a halo around each child's head, so why wasn't that first photo the one that was a double exposure?
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Aug 4, 2017 4:35:57 GMT -5
"""Hi Mouse, I am only interested in the original post regardless what someone else has already said"" that doesn't make any sense at all Hi Mouse, I will answer the post that I feel like answering whatever you say.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Aug 4, 2017 4:44:25 GMT -5
"""Hi Mouse, I am only interested in the original post regardless what someone else has already said"" that doesn't make any sense at all Hi Mouse, I will answer the post that I feel like answering whatever you say. have I in any way indicated that you should NOT comment... no of course I haven't nor would I or any one else ... but regardless of your false accusation . it still doesnt make sense
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Aug 4, 2017 5:41:55 GMT -5
It's an old Cheech and Chong joke.... Hi Fretslider, Obviously I haven't heard it before, Get acquainted..
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Aug 4, 2017 6:57:47 GMT -5
that's exactly the conclusion I came too.. a double exposure Hi Mouse, so what about the first photo? There was a halo around each child's head, so why wasn't that first photo the one that was a double exposure? what first photo ?I have been through each page but haven't come across any other photos of children with or without halos?
|
|
|
Post by annaj26 on Aug 4, 2017 8:52:41 GMT -5
that's exactly the conclusion I came too.. a double exposure Hi Mouse, so what about the first photo? There was a halo around each child's head, so why wasn't that first photo the one that was a double exposure? Okay, I'm lost. Where is the picture with halos. Any help finding it would be appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Aug 4, 2017 18:47:36 GMT -5
Hi Mouse, I will answer the post that I feel like answering whatever you say. have I in any way indicated that you should NOT comment... no of course I haven't nor would I or any one else ... but regardless of your false accusation . it still doesnt make sense Hi Mouse, You are entitled to your personal opinion the same a I am. Think what you like.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Aug 4, 2017 19:33:46 GMT -5
It is still an interesting picture, if is a double exposure how come you only see the small boy in one exposure and apparently nothing else?
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Aug 4, 2017 22:49:07 GMT -5
Hi Mike Marshall, that is very interesting that you have spent a lifetime studying the paranormal, as a simple person, I just accept what experiences I have and this tells me that this is a strange world and that anything unusual can happen, which means that the physical realm is not as ordinary as we think, that there is more to it than meets the eye. I study many things in life. Because I am open-minded I do not jump to conclusions nor do I simply accept any experience as valid without it fulfilling a number of criteria. But when not only have you, your wife and children seen the ghost walking through walls; when a settee on which all four of you are sitting moves through the air of its own volition; when even five years after you have left the home workmen repairing it complain about seeing ghosts and being harrassed by them, it is more irrational to doubt that SOMETHING unusual took place within that house. Whether you choose to call it a ghost or not is a matter of semantics. Even though I am temperamentally a sceptic I cannot doubt the repeated evidence of paranormal activity. Where you and I would probably disagree is over our willingness to assign an explanation to the strange phenomena. Hi Mike Marshall, I wish I had been there to witness these happenings, how amazing.!!! I'm just wondering what the reason was for you to be given these experiences. I have never had that happen to me. As a member of ECKANKAR, we are led to believe that these happenings are meant to hold your interest so that you will spend your lifetime chasing after these kind of things instead of what is really important and that is realizing that you are really Soul and finding your way back to God. This is a distraction brought about by the negative force, and designed to keep you returning time and time again to this Earth plane
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Aug 4, 2017 23:09:38 GMT -5
Hi Fretslider, Thanks for displaying your sense of humour from both you and Mike Marshall, it does lighten things somewhat and always appreciated.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Aug 4, 2017 23:33:39 GMT -5
Hi Fretslider, Obviously I haven't heard it before, Get acquainted.. Hi Fretslider, Unfortunately I was unable to get acquainted.Seeing videos or pictures doesn't work for me.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Aug 5, 2017 3:42:35 GMT -5
have I in any way indicated that you should NOT comment... no of course I haven't nor would I or any one else ... but regardless of your false accusation . it still doesnt make sense Hi Mouse, You are entitled to your personal opinion the same a I am. Think what you like. yes you are entitled to your opinion kno one but know one has stated other wise at any time
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Aug 5, 2017 3:56:37 GMT -5
It is still an interesting picture, if is a double exposure how come you only see the small boy in one exposure and apparently nothing else? there is more to see but rather spoilt by the flash lighting but look at the edge of the sofa.. you can see the curve of the arm rest through the ghost boy. typical of d exposure .. the two curves in the material on the far left edge already mentioned theres also an oblong on the right hand top of the table... am still going with double exposure as all the shadows are wrong because of flash do we know which other photo yet
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Aug 5, 2017 4:06:34 GMT -5
Hi Fretslider, Unfortunately I was unable to get acquainted.Seeing videos or pictures doesn't work for me. I#ll let you know when the spirit version comes out.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Aug 5, 2017 18:48:20 GMT -5
It is still an interesting picture, if is a double exposure how come you only see the small boy in one exposure and apparently nothing else? there is more to see but rather spoilt by the flash lighting but look at the edge of the sofa.. you can see the curve of the arm rest through the ghost boy. typical of d exposure .. the two curves in the material on the far left edge already mentioned theres also an oblong on the right hand top of the table... am still going with double exposure as all the shadows are wrong because of flash do we know which other photo yet It is a bit strange there certainly seems to be something going on. The end of the sofa does not look right, it almost looks as if that boy has ducked down or something like that, it clearly does not look right.
|
|