Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2016 19:34:23 GMT -5
Obviously, I don't read Rolling Stone. openmindedness can lead one into more trouble than they ever bargained for...have to be wary of the garbage allowed in your head while trying to appear hip. Obviously? how would that be obvious to me? I don't believe open mindedness can lead to anywhere negative. Being aware of different beliefs and life sytles etc is not "garbage in your head", imo. Most people on the board know I'm older...65 in 11 days and I'm Christian so the articles hold no interest for me. We disagree on openmindedness...I'm not against it, just be careful. The sexual revolution seemed a good idea in the sixties but has led to more sexual diseases, illegitimate children, higher welfare costs plus legalized murder of unborn babies....openmindedness led us down a path we should have never gone down....oh yeah, I was there at age 17 rebelling with the crowd.
|
|
|
Post by beth on Sept 1, 2016 19:46:12 GMT -5
Apparently, according to the article, it is not sexual role playing. The article itself was published by Rolling Stone online, I suspect they cater to a more open minded / curious sort. Obviously, I don't read Rolling Stone. openmindedness can lead one into more trouble than they ever bargained for...have to be wary of the garbage allowed in your head while trying to appear hip. Chef, I don't think anyone who has not read the complete article should attempt to discuss it. If you want to have your say, fine, but don't just go off on a knee jerk reaction if you don't know what the article is about. Rolling Stone prejudice is off topic. If you want to delve into that, start a thread for it.
|
|
|
Post by beth on Sept 1, 2016 19:49:54 GMT -5
Age isn't an issue. My mom read Rolling Stone. It's a damned good magazine. lol I MIGHT start a thread for meaningless media prejudice.
|
|
|
Post by beth on Sept 1, 2016 19:53:21 GMT -5
Most people on the board know I'm older...65 in 11 days and I'm Christian so the articles hold no interest for me. We disagree on openmindedness...I'm not against it, just be careful. The sexual revolution seemed a good idea in the sixties but has led to more sexual diseases, illegitimate children, higher welfare costs plus legalized murder of unborn babies....openmindedness led us down a path we should have never gone down....oh yeah, I was there at age 17 rebelling with the crowd. One question, Chef ... You haven't read the article, you find the subject distasteful without actually knowing much about it, so why are you posting on this thread?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2016 19:54:37 GMT -5
Age isn't an issue. My mom read Rolling Stone. It's a damned good magazine. lol I MIGHT start a thread for meaningless media prejudice. It's all down to what each individual enjoys reading....I never read Rolling Stone when young and won't start up now. In my twenties, I enjoyed the articles in Playboy and cartoons but I wouldn't read it now for my own personal reasons. RS must be a good magazine because it's still around after decades.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2016 19:57:11 GMT -5
Obviously, I don't read Rolling Stone. openmindedness can lead one into more trouble than they ever bargained for...have to be wary of the garbage allowed in your head while trying to appear hip. Chef, I don't think anyone who has not read the complete article should attempt to discuss it. If you want to have your say, fine, but don't just go off on a knee jerk reaction if you don't know what the article is about. Rolling Stone prejudice is off topic. If you want to delve into that, start a thread for it. I read the article before commenting..it's about people with a few screws loose that want to broadcast it. I was only answering Apple's question as she didn't understand my usage of the word obviously...I had forgotten there are some that are new to knowing me. I don't get where you think I'm prejudiced against RS.....
|
|
|
Post by beth on Sept 1, 2016 20:10:40 GMT -5
I don't get where you think I'm prejudiced against RS..... It was your use of the word "obviously". It IS a good mag, more for music people but over-all, yeah very decent, though not as good now as years ago. If you read the article, that's all I ask. Carry on.
|
|
|
Post by beth on Sept 1, 2016 20:14:13 GMT -5
It's way beyond kinky. In fact without a doctor it's a non-starter. Oh, I see what you mean. Women can't lactate at will. I don't think it's particularly kinky but rather, very very personal. If I had friends who were into this, I would not want them to share that information with me.
|
|
|
Post by Sysop3 on Sept 1, 2016 21:14:53 GMT -5
I guess I look at it more like Apple. Consenting adults? Why would I want to sit in judgement? I wouldnot choose to participate in anything like that, but to each his or her own.
Chefmate, what if the people in question are consenting adults, married to each other. Would your "sin radar" go off, even then?
if it would, then "why?".
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Sept 1, 2016 21:21:09 GMT -5
I guess I look at it more like Apple. Consenting adults? Why would I want to sit in judgement? I wouldnot choose to participate in anything like that, but to each his or her own. Chefmate, what if the people in question are consenting adults, married to each other. Would your "sin radar" go off, even then? if it would, then "why?". Hi Sysop3, I have no problem with that.!!!
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Sept 1, 2016 21:30:33 GMT -5
perverts..imo breasts were designed to feed babies...not adults...what is wrong with these people some times I just get tired of pervets of various types who bring human bodies and their functions down to the lowest level possibly Hi Mouse, what is perverted about that. breasts have always been associated with sex just as your lips are, but lips can be used to kiss your child although kissing is part of foreplay as well. The same applies to breasts. I'm talking about a person's relationship with their Spouse or Partner. I haven't read any books or magazines on anything that is sexual and have not practised anything like that before or after marriage. I was a prude.
|
|
|
Post by Tail Wagging The Dog on Sept 2, 2016 0:16:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Sept 2, 2016 1:37:55 GMT -5
It's way beyond kinky. In fact without a doctor it's a non-starter. Oh, I see what you mean. Women can't lactate at will. I don't think it's particularly kinky but rather, very very personal. If I had friends who were into this, I would not want them to share that information with me. Hi Beth, the person who practised this would have had to have a child first and maybe it gave them the idea. My husband was turned on by watching me breast feed, though we never got involved in what has been discussed
|
|
|
Post by beth on Sept 2, 2016 2:38:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Sept 2, 2016 4:05:43 GMT -5
Obviously, I don't read Rolling Stone. openmindedness can lead one into more trouble than they ever bargained for...have to be wary of the garbage allowed in your head while trying to appear hip. Obviously? how would that be obvious to me? I don't believe open mindedness can lead to anywhere negative. Being aware of different beliefs and life sytles etc is not "garbage in your head", imo. openminded..mm or enabling ???perversions ..what passes for openmindedness can lead to some very dark places indeed..... and some very questionable sexual practises make a great deal of money for those catering to those practises...catering to those practises at the cost of the freedoms of others ei traffickers in women..boys and children are you really happy to be party to such misery by """Being aware of different beliefs and life sytles""" there are those into beastiality[and think it should be legal]is an animal able to consent ? there are those who like children and even more revolting, babies, and think their sexual habits should be regarded as normal and legal and who fighting to get their perversions acceptable in law
|
|