Alpha 
Post by fretslider on Jun 5, 2020 5:06:04 GMT -5
I've scoured every MSM publication/outlet and nobody is prepared to go against the current narrative, not even the, er, far right press.
You have been warned:
Coronavirus patients treated with malaria drug hydroxychloroquine touted by Trump are MORE likely to die, new trial finds, but the president says he is unaware of the new study
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8241855/More-deaths-no-benefit-malaria-drug-VA-virus-study.html
Trump stops hyping hydroxychloroquine after study shows no benefit
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/22/trump-hydroxychloroquine-study-coronavirus
So there you have it. The MSM has warned you about these 'old' drugs, they kill.
The one constant in this pandemic has been Bad Data. Data so obviously bad we now have the joke: Man eaten by shark dies of coronavirus.
And now for the bit they don't want you to know - they'd have reported if they did, right?
The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals, on Thursday retracted an influential study that raised alarms about the safety of the experimental Covid-19 treatments chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine amid scrutiny of the data underlying the paper.
Just over an hour later, the New England Journal of Medicine retracted a separate study, focused on blood pressure medications in Covid-19, that relied on data from the same company.
wattsupwiththat.com/2020/06/04/lancet-new-england-journal-retract-covid-19-studies-including-one-that-raised-safety-concerns-about-malaria-drugs/
The Lancet paper, “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis,” which relied on data from a private company called Surgisphere and had concluded that hydroxychloroquine was linked to a higher risk of death among some COVID-19 patients, has been dogged by questions since its publication in late May. Some of those complaints led to a correction about aspects of the data, but at the time the authors stood by their conclusions — namely, that hydrochloroquine and chloroquine do not to appear to be effective against the viral infection.
That correction was followed earlier this week by the expression of concern, and now three of the four authors of the article have decided to pull it entirely. The abstaining author, Sapan Desai, is the founder of Surgisphere,
retractionwatch.com/
It speaks volumes about how totally useless scientific peer-review has become.
It screams out how biased and partial the MSM is.
Would we have had this circus if Trump had said nothing? I think that's a given.
You have been warned:
Coronavirus patients treated with malaria drug hydroxychloroquine touted by Trump are MORE likely to die, new trial finds, but the president says he is unaware of the new study
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8241855/More-deaths-no-benefit-malaria-drug-VA-virus-study.html
Trump stops hyping hydroxychloroquine after study shows no benefit
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/apr/22/trump-hydroxychloroquine-study-coronavirus
So there you have it. The MSM has warned you about these 'old' drugs, they kill.
The one constant in this pandemic has been Bad Data. Data so obviously bad we now have the joke: Man eaten by shark dies of coronavirus.
And now for the bit they don't want you to know - they'd have reported if they did, right?
The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals, on Thursday retracted an influential study that raised alarms about the safety of the experimental Covid-19 treatments chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine amid scrutiny of the data underlying the paper.
Just over an hour later, the New England Journal of Medicine retracted a separate study, focused on blood pressure medications in Covid-19, that relied on data from the same company.
wattsupwiththat.com/2020/06/04/lancet-new-england-journal-retract-covid-19-studies-including-one-that-raised-safety-concerns-about-malaria-drugs/
The Lancet paper, “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis,” which relied on data from a private company called Surgisphere and had concluded that hydroxychloroquine was linked to a higher risk of death among some COVID-19 patients, has been dogged by questions since its publication in late May. Some of those complaints led to a correction about aspects of the data, but at the time the authors stood by their conclusions — namely, that hydrochloroquine and chloroquine do not to appear to be effective against the viral infection.
That correction was followed earlier this week by the expression of concern, and now three of the four authors of the article have decided to pull it entirely. The abstaining author, Sapan Desai, is the founder of Surgisphere,
retractionwatch.com/
It speaks volumes about how totally useless scientific peer-review has become.
It screams out how biased and partial the MSM is.
Would we have had this circus if Trump had said nothing? I think that's a given.