|
Post by fretslider on Apr 7, 2019 8:18:13 GMT -5
Timing is all. The EU cannot lose. Every new agreement the EU negotiates pulls the rug from under us - Japan now sends cars from Japan with no tariff, why bother with factories in England any more? Why is it the UK can't make cars? Or indeed do anything bar launder money for the criminal elite of the world, and indeed pay off corrupt bankers debts with the social security funds of ordinary folk.
Seriously? You don't know why [heavy] industries moved out of the US and Europe? Nevermind, I'm sure you can imagine something, it's pointless telling you why.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Apr 8, 2019 18:34:56 GMT -5
Why is it the UK can't make cars? Or indeed do anything bar launder money for the criminal elite of the world, and indeed pay off corrupt bankers debts with the social security funds of ordinary folk.
lordy kronks even you can be so blind as to not know the answers our UK car industry was deliberately broken up[though we still do make cars on a small scale] in the interests of the eu which has more or less divided Europe up into various zones... financial... industry...farming ..light manufacturing .. fishing .. tourist etc one of the reasons so many of our industries were offered huge financial incentives to relocate to eastern Europe
Was broken up cos the middle classes could not manage it properly, British workers can do a great job under foreign managment but when british duffers are in charge the wheels fall off the wagon literally..
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Apr 8, 2019 19:24:31 GMT -5
Why is it the UK can't make cars? Or indeed do anything bar launder money for the criminal elite of the world, and indeed pay off corrupt bankers debts with the social security funds of ordinary folk.
Seriously? You don't know why [heavy] industries moved out of the US and Europe? Nevermind, I'm sure you can imagine something, it's pointless telling you why.
They stayed in the UK under foreign management, the british managers were useless, that was the problem, still is.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Apr 9, 2019 4:00:14 GMT -5
lordy kronks even you can be so blind as to not know the answers our UK car industry was deliberately broken up[though we still do make cars on a small scale] in the interests of the eu which has more or less divided Europe up into various zones... financial... industry...farming ..light manufacturing .. fishing .. tourist etc one of the reasons so many of our industries were offered huge financial incentives to relocate to eastern Europe Was broken up cos the middle classes could not manage it properly, British workers can do a great job under foreign managment but when british duffers are in charge the wheels fall off the wagon literally..
strewth but your a know nothing ,it wasn't management having strike after strike to the detriment of the car industry ,I have given you one real reason for the break up... but your too damned thick to understand or even have a reasoned debate about it ….. a clue... find out how Europe will look under the eu reallocation and area plans and another clue is look at tarrifs and ask your self why is it cheaper to make cars in Japan, and what is one of Germanys biggest exports and one of the reasons they are terrified of us being able to trade at will with the rest of the world
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Apr 10, 2019 7:12:23 GMT -5
Seriously? You don't know why [heavy] industries moved out of the US and Europe? Nevermind, I'm sure you can imagine something, it's pointless telling you why. They stayed in the UK under foreign management, the british managers were useless, that was the problem, still is.
As I said: I'm sure you can imagine something, it's pointless telling you why.Why not break your no-reading rule and read up on globalisation and the Heckscher–Ohlin theorem. ...having watched their industrial heartlands wash away, governments throughout the West are now finding that they cannot be revived with a tweak to monetary policy. www.oxford-royale.co.uk/articles/west-economy-misbalanced-services-manufacturing.htmlOr you could always dream something wholly erroneous up. A choice between being informed or being a village idiot - you'll pick the latter, you always do.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Apr 10, 2019 14:43:42 GMT -5
Was broken up cos the middle classes could not manage it properly, British workers can do a great job under foreign managment but when british duffers are in charge the wheels fall off the wagon literally..
strewth but your a know nothing ,it wasn't management having strike after strike to the detriment of the car industry ,I have given you one real reason for the break up... but your too damned thick to understand or even have a reasoned debate about it ….. a clue... find out how Europe will look under the eu reallocation and area plans and another clue is look at tarrifs and ask your self why is it cheaper to make cars in Japan, and what is one of Germanys biggest exports and one of the reasons they are terrified of us being able to trade at will with the rest of the world The strikes were cause by the managemen them and us attitude.
Ever hear of a strike at a Japanese run plant?
No becasue they see the workforce as assets to be nourish, not slave labour to be exploited then thrown on the scrap heap.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Apr 10, 2019 14:46:20 GMT -5
They stayed in the UK under foreign management, the british managers were useless, that was the problem, still is.
As I said: I'm sure you can imagine something, it's pointless telling you why.Why not break your no-reading rule and read up on globalisation and the Heckscher–Ohlin theorem. ...having watched their industrial heartlands wash away, governments throughout the West are now finding that they cannot be revived with a tweak to monetary policy. www.oxford-royale.co.uk/articles/west-economy-misbalanced-services-manufacturing.htmlOr you could always dream something wholly erroneous up. A choice between being informed or being a village idiot - you'll pick the latter, you always do.
It is because they do not invest in industry, instead they invest in oily banking spivs and their massive finiancal frauds which bankrupt nations.
All they have left is worthless pieces of paper, a paper trail of fraud.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Apr 11, 2019 14:03:16 GMT -5
As I said: I'm sure you can imagine something, it's pointless telling you why.Why not break your no-reading rule and read up on globalisation and the Heckscher–Ohlin theorem. ...having watched their industrial heartlands wash away, governments throughout the West are now finding that they cannot be revived with a tweak to monetary policy. www.oxford-royale.co.uk/articles/west-economy-misbalanced-services-manufacturing.htmlOr you could always dream something wholly erroneous up. A choice between being informed or being a village idiot - you'll pick the latter, you always do. It is because they do not invest in industry, instead they invest in oily banking spivs and their massive finiancal frauds which bankrupt nations. All they have left is worthless pieces of paper, a paper trail of fraud.
Not going to read and get informed about anything, are you! Maybe pictures might help? The Heckscher–Ohlin theorem Basic situation: Two identical countries (A and B) have different initial factor endowments. Autarky equilibrium (A A, A B): no trade, individual production equals consumption. Trade equilibrium: both countries consume the same (C A = C B), especially beyond their own Production–possibility frontier; production and consumption points are divergent.
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Apr 12, 2019 10:51:28 GMT -5
It is because they do not invest in industry, instead they invest in oily banking spivs and their massive finiancal frauds which bankrupt nations. All they have left is worthless pieces of paper, a paper trail of fraud.
Not going to read and get informed about anything, are you! Maybe pictures might help? The Heckscher–Ohlin theorem Basic situation: Two identical countries (A and B) have different initial factor endowments. Autarky equilibrium (A A, A B): no trade, individual production equals consumption. Trade equilibrium: both countries consume the same (C A = C B), especially beyond their own Production–possibility frontier; production and consumption points are divergent. I don't need graphs and other people theories, I find my own ideas are the most accurate and best.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Apr 13, 2019 5:10:08 GMT -5
Not going to read and get informed about anything, are you! Maybe pictures might help? The Heckscher–Ohlin theorem Basic situation: Two identical countries (A and B) have different initial factor endowments. Autarky equilibrium (A A, A B): no trade, individual production equals consumption. Trade equilibrium: both countries consume the same (C A = C B), especially beyond their own Production–possibility frontier; production and consumption points are divergent. I don't need graphs and other people theories, I find my own ideas are the most accurate and best. Simple is as simple does... Most of the valuable lessons I have learned is stuff I taught myself
And when you are taught stuff you are actually being taught to be stupid Quod Erat Demonstrandum
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Apr 21, 2019 22:23:33 GMT -5
I don't need graphs and other people theories, I find my own ideas are the most accurate and best. Simple is as simple does... Most of the valuable lessons I have learned is stuff I taught myself
And when you are taught stuff you are actually being taught to be stupid Quod Erat Demonstrandum I am right, the only way you truly learn is by working out the answers yourself.
being taught is like weight training except your instructor is lifting the weights for you.
To learn you have to exercise the mind.
Your mind could do with a good work out!
Mine is as fit as a fiddle!
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Apr 22, 2019 4:44:56 GMT -5
Simple is as simple does... Most of the valuable lessons I have learned is stuff I taught myself
And when you are taught stuff you are actually being taught to be stupid Quod Erat Demonstrandum I am right, the only way you truly learn is by working out the answers yourself. being taught is like weight training except your instructor is lifting the weights for you. To learn you have to exercise the mind. Your mind could do with a good work out! Mine is as fit as a fiddle!
being taught is like weight training except your instructor is lifting the weights for you
Most of the valuable lessons I have learned is stuff I taught myself
And when you are taught stuff you are actually being taught to be stupid Still tying yourself up in knots, eh.
|
|