|
Post by fretslider on Mar 7, 2017 16:12:06 GMT -5
[The LGBT Agenda for 5 to 11 year olds] Newly built primary schools in Glasgow will have just one set of bathroom facilities for both boys and girls in a move the city’s Education Services say “assists in the LGBT agenda”. There will be no separate lavatories for boys and girls in three new primary schools. Council bosses claim unisex toilets provide a more comfortable experience for LGBT children, boost cleanliness, and reduce bullying, bad behaviour, and costs, reports The Herald. “Bullying is reduced, behaviour is improved, no graffiti, no soggy bombs on the ceilings,” said Estate Programme Manager for Education Services, David McEwan. “It also assists in the LGBT agenda because if we have children even in primary school who are confused about their gender and worry, ‘Do I go to the girl’s toilet or the boy’s toilet?’ – well, it doesn’t matter,” he added. In a letter to the council, objector Joyce McCann raised concerns about pupils sharing toilets if their religion doesn’t allow it. Allan Walker urged Glasgow City Council to produce evidence for the claim that same-sex toilets reduce bullying. Last year, it was revealed that four-year-old infants in Brighton are being asked to “choose” the gender they “identify” with before they even start school. In 2013, Brighton & Hove City Council launched a “Trans Inclusion Schools Toolkit”, encouraging schools and parents to “support transgender and gender questioning” children, which “may include taking hormones and or having gender reassignment surgeries”. www.heraldscotland.com/news/15136157.Unisex_toilets_planned_for_new_build_primary_schools_in_Glasgow/?ref=rss#comments-anchorHow snowflakes are made. If an adult can be radicalised imagine what you can do with 4 year olds... Brighton and Hove parents have raised concerns about being asked to support their three and four-year-olds to choose which gender, if any, they identify with when accepting a place for primary schools.
...
After the tickbox for male/female, a note explained that the national recording system only gives these two options, and asked parents to “support your child to choose they gender they most identify with or if they have another gender identity please leave this blank and discuss this with your child’s school”.www.brightonandhovenews.org/2016/04/19/brighton-and-hove-schools-ask-three-year-olds-what-gender-if-any-they-identify-with/What was that about sexualising children?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 8, 2017 8:01:30 GMT -5
as usual the majority being bent to the will of the minority..for no good reason either I would like to know the exact numbers of transgender children at each school which brings in these new toileting arrangement in theory I have no problem with unisex toileting in practise ..well that's a whole new ball game as a woman I do not wish to share rest room facilities with men..and fail to why I should be forced to.. in practicalities there are several reasons not to be doing so..safety being one of them hygene being another...smells and general atmosphere also play a part in schools there are also practicalities...will the girls be happy with the smells and wet seats and constant puddles ....and where will the boys go to see who can aim hightest
seriously there are those who have lost the plot and those who have an agenda just as the gay brigade did and succeeding in I shudder to think what the next assault will be....legalised incest or pedophillia ?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 8, 2017 8:13:26 GMT -5
of course it might have a civilising influence ...but I doubt it...
|
|
|
Post by Dex on Mar 8, 2017 9:22:00 GMT -5
as usual the majority being bent to the will of the minority..for no good reason either I would like to know the exact numbers of transgender children at each school which brings in these new toileting arrangement in theory I have no problem with unisex toileting in practise ..well that's a whole new ball game as a woman I do not wish to share rest room facilities with men..and fail to why I should be forced to.. in practicalities there are several reasons not to be doing so..safety being one of them hygene being another...smells and general atmosphere also play a part in schools there are also practicalities...will the girls be happy with the smells and wet seats and constant puddles ....and where will the boys go to see who can aim hightest seriously there are those who have lost the plot and those who have an agenda just as the gay brigade did and succeeding in I shudder to think what the next assault will be....legalised incest or pedophillia ? You mean you think boys have bad bathroom habits and girls don't?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 8, 2017 11:25:07 GMT -5
actually no..but I do think boys are more careless than girls in general and theres the constant gripe of the seat being left up[lol]
|
|
|
Post by Sysop3 on Mar 8, 2017 17:33:06 GMT -5
actually no..but I do think boys are more careless than girls in general and theres the constant gripe of the seat being left up[lol] Boy to girl tranies would probably be more feminine than masculine and without feminine hygiene products to dispose of.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Mar 9, 2017 3:00:16 GMT -5
actually no..but I do think boys are more careless than girls in general and theres the constant gripe of the seat being left up[lol] Boy to girl tranies would probably be more feminine than masculine and without feminine hygiene products to dispose of. b but trans go both ways..plus just how many potential trans would be in any one school or class of 4-11 yr olds ...theres a great possibility of making mistakes when it comes to tomboy girls or softer boys and deeming them potential trans ..when the reality is they are nothing of the sort very dodgy to be manipulating young children..rather unhealth6y too
|
|