Alpha 
Post by fretslider on Nov 19, 2016 17:01:06 GMT -5
A new generation of highly-sophisticated robotics and animatronics has already created commercially available sex robots almost indistinguishable from humans. And future versions of the androids will offer men bespoke sexual stimuli which are just not available in real life women.
Concepts already on the table include vaginas which vibrate 100s of times a second and variable programmable boobs offering anything from a AA cup to a giant KKK and above, depending on the taste of the customer. The designers behind the jaw-droppingly human-looking sex robots say they are set to take sex to the next level, bringing levels of sexual pleasure never experienced in human history.
The current generation sexbots are already scarily realistic with “lifelike warm skin” and a pulse but newer generations only a few years away will be essentially be impossible to tell from human women. Except in the way their sex organs are engineered with added extras to heighten sexual pleasure just not available in humans.
The hot cyborgs will even “talk dirty” and “respond” to their human lovers. Mat McMullen, CEO of sex doll company RealDoll, said: “Everyone wants to know – what is it going to be like? "It's going to be an amazing new experience that no one has ever had before. “We're trying to create the desire to have sex beyond the physical.
"In order for people to find themselves attracted to the A.I – she's really funny, she makes me laugh, she has the same interests as me. "So then blokes want to take it to the next level – to give them that feeling – 'I'd really like to have sex with her'." But Mr McMullen insisted the sex robots will not replace human relationships, instead they will be there to improve the man’s “bedroom skills”. He told The Daily Star Online: “You go to the gym, you get stronger. "Having sex with the robot is only going to help you with your 'skills’.
"It will get you to last longer in bed, try different positions and be more adventurous.” The top CEO even went as far to say men will be able to seduce, charm and engage in conversation with the robot. He added: “People might have sexual fantasies about bondage or threesomes or specific fetishes – but this is a whole new thing altogether. "People will think, I've had sex with women – now I'm going to have the chance to have sex with a robot.
www.express.co.uk/news/uk/732912/Sex-robot-human-sexual-pleasure-Real-doll
How long before some poor deluded soul starts campaigning for cyborg rights??? Should we not also consider the toaster, or the calculator or the dishwasher?
Hold up. We're still dealing with the non-existent at the moment....
After 30 years of captivating if unreliable service, the lovely Samantha – resident scorer of BBC Radio 4’s panel game I’m Sorry I Haven’t a Clue – is in big trouble.
Samantha’s nippings-out are both the reason why we never learn the show’s score, and the key to one of its longest-running jokes. As in: “Samantha has to nip out now to meet her new gentleman friend. They’re going on a driving tour of Wales, and he’s looking forward to showing her Cardiff and Cardigan Bay, before going on to Bangor in the back of his van.” Or, “Samantha has to nip out now as she’s meeting her new bird-watcher gentleman friend. The last time they were together he showed her twelve finches.” To most listeners, all this belongs to the gloriously smutty tradition of British humour.
So when a complaint came in from a listener who found the Samantha routines “highly sexist, offensive and harmful”, the Beeb did what it does best. It panicked. An investigation was launched, which had to decide whether, for instance, a line about Samantha going to a horror film with two gentleman friends (“because she likes nothing better than sitting in the back row being given the willies”) was, as the complainant alleged, contrary to the recommendation of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women.
The BBC has investigated after concern the imaginary character of “the lovely Samantha” on Radio 4’s I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue is the victim of harmful sexist objectification
Samantha doesn't exist. Many great comedies have a fictional unseen character, eg Howard Wolowitz's shouty mother in Big Bang Theory, or Maris, neurotic wife of Niles Crane in Frasier.
Only a brain dead idiot would be offended on behalf of a fictional character to the point of making a formal complaint as per the recommendation of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women. And only the BBC would be supine enough to investigate it. What an utter waste of time (and money), but hey, that's political correctness. Even that which does not exist has human rights.
Now, back to the real world...
...do robots need protection from us too? As the 'minds' of machines evolve ever closer to something that's hard to tell apart from human intelligence, new generations of technology may need to be afforded the kinds of moral and legal protections we usually think of as 'human' rights, says mathematician Marcus du Sautoy from the University of Oxford
Concepts already on the table include vaginas which vibrate 100s of times a second and variable programmable boobs offering anything from a AA cup to a giant KKK and above, depending on the taste of the customer. The designers behind the jaw-droppingly human-looking sex robots say they are set to take sex to the next level, bringing levels of sexual pleasure never experienced in human history.
The current generation sexbots are already scarily realistic with “lifelike warm skin” and a pulse but newer generations only a few years away will be essentially be impossible to tell from human women. Except in the way their sex organs are engineered with added extras to heighten sexual pleasure just not available in humans.
The hot cyborgs will even “talk dirty” and “respond” to their human lovers. Mat McMullen, CEO of sex doll company RealDoll, said: “Everyone wants to know – what is it going to be like? "It's going to be an amazing new experience that no one has ever had before. “We're trying to create the desire to have sex beyond the physical.
"In order for people to find themselves attracted to the A.I – she's really funny, she makes me laugh, she has the same interests as me. "So then blokes want to take it to the next level – to give them that feeling – 'I'd really like to have sex with her'." But Mr McMullen insisted the sex robots will not replace human relationships, instead they will be there to improve the man’s “bedroom skills”. He told The Daily Star Online: “You go to the gym, you get stronger. "Having sex with the robot is only going to help you with your 'skills’.
"It will get you to last longer in bed, try different positions and be more adventurous.” The top CEO even went as far to say men will be able to seduce, charm and engage in conversation with the robot. He added: “People might have sexual fantasies about bondage or threesomes or specific fetishes – but this is a whole new thing altogether. "People will think, I've had sex with women – now I'm going to have the chance to have sex with a robot.
www.express.co.uk/news/uk/732912/Sex-robot-human-sexual-pleasure-Real-doll
How long before some poor deluded soul starts campaigning for cyborg rights??? Should we not also consider the toaster, or the calculator or the dishwasher?
Hold up. We're still dealing with the non-existent at the moment....
After 30 years of captivating if unreliable service, the lovely Samantha – resident scorer of BBC Radio 4’s panel game I’m Sorry I Haven’t a Clue – is in big trouble.
Samantha’s nippings-out are both the reason why we never learn the show’s score, and the key to one of its longest-running jokes. As in: “Samantha has to nip out now to meet her new gentleman friend. They’re going on a driving tour of Wales, and he’s looking forward to showing her Cardiff and Cardigan Bay, before going on to Bangor in the back of his van.” Or, “Samantha has to nip out now as she’s meeting her new bird-watcher gentleman friend. The last time they were together he showed her twelve finches.” To most listeners, all this belongs to the gloriously smutty tradition of British humour.
So when a complaint came in from a listener who found the Samantha routines “highly sexist, offensive and harmful”, the Beeb did what it does best. It panicked. An investigation was launched, which had to decide whether, for instance, a line about Samantha going to a horror film with two gentleman friends (“because she likes nothing better than sitting in the back row being given the willies”) was, as the complainant alleged, contrary to the recommendation of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women.
The BBC has investigated after concern the imaginary character of “the lovely Samantha” on Radio 4’s I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue is the victim of harmful sexist objectification
Samantha doesn't exist. Many great comedies have a fictional unseen character, eg Howard Wolowitz's shouty mother in Big Bang Theory, or Maris, neurotic wife of Niles Crane in Frasier.
Only a brain dead idiot would be offended on behalf of a fictional character to the point of making a formal complaint as per the recommendation of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women. And only the BBC would be supine enough to investigate it. What an utter waste of time (and money), but hey, that's political correctness. Even that which does not exist has human rights.
Now, back to the real world...
...do robots need protection from us too? As the 'minds' of machines evolve ever closer to something that's hard to tell apart from human intelligence, new generations of technology may need to be afforded the kinds of moral and legal protections we usually think of as 'human' rights, says mathematician Marcus du Sautoy from the University of Oxford