|
Post by kronks on Dec 13, 2018 17:20:16 GMT -5
Once again God beat the scientists!!!
How many times have Jehova's witnesses been mock reviled and ridiculed for not having blood transfusions?
Seems like they were right and the scientific "experts"
|
|
|
Post by annaj26 on Dec 13, 2018 21:56:40 GMT -5
Once again God beat the scientists!!! How many times have Jehova's witnesses been mock reviled and ridiculed for not having blood transfusions? Seems like they were right and the scientific "experts"
Even if that turns out to be true, Kronks, many hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved through transfusions. What's more, my aunt had a number of transfusions and is totally sharp minded at 84. Daily Mail might not be the best source.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Dec 14, 2018 5:02:25 GMT -5
and one of my sisters had Alzheimer's and she had never had a blood transfusion
and of course the type of transfusion being talked about is not the every day transfusion where by voluntary blood donations are given to the blood bank
the blood in question is this """The transfusions (called HGH) contained hormones from cadavers' pituitary gland""
|
|
|
Post by kronks on Dec 14, 2018 17:46:55 GMT -5
Once again God beat the scientists!!! How many times have Jehova's witnesses been mock reviled and ridiculed for not having blood transfusions? Seems like they were right and the scientific "experts"
Even if that turns out to be true, Kronks, many hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved through transfusions. What's more, my aunt had a number of transfusions and is totally sharp minded at 84. Daily Mail might not be the best source.
Actually if you look into it you will find blood transfusion are not as good as you think.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Dec 15, 2018 8:23:54 GMT -5
Once again God beat the scientists!!! How many times have Jehova's witnesses been mock reviled and ridiculed for not having blood transfusions? Seems like they were right and the scientific "experts"
What a simple soul. From your own source, which you don't seem to have read.... The technique was banned in 1985Handy hint, it's the tail end of 2018. As Anna has pointed out, transfusions have saved millions of lives over the last 60 years. You could have been honest and factual and pointed out that this is a study that is monitoring the survivors of that banned technique. But no, you go completely doolally and claim there is a god, and not only but also, that this god knew about the flaws in the technique and did nothing. Barking mad.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Dec 15, 2018 8:31:22 GMT -5
Once again God beat the scientists!!! How many times have Jehova's witnesses been mock reviled and ridiculed for not having blood transfusions? Seems like they were right and the scientific "experts"
Even if that turns out to be true, Kronks, many hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved through transfusions. What's more, my aunt had a number of transfusions and is totally sharp minded at 84. Daily Mail might not be the best source. It really isn't the source in this case, it's an attempt to put a religious spin on something that was banned 32 years ago. The technique was banned in 1985, replaced with synthetic hormones, and researchers have been monitoring the survivors for other side effects ever since.You should know kronks has a real problem with reality.
|
|