Randy, I'm not a fan of either candidate. I'd have preferred neither to be the candidate of their party.
On a scale of positive dislike of both I'd put Trump at about 1 out of 10 and Clinton at about 2.
But both are toxic and neither is qualified to run the proverbial whelk stall.
I remember the mess Clinton made of healthcare when her hubby was in charge.
I remember the war of aggression against Yugoslavia that she supported.
But I also remember Trump's slimy, misogynistic, racist and patronising jeers at almost everyone.
I have never thought of Trump's supporters as being stupid or ignorant.
Don't forget - I'm a Brexiteer and I've been told incessantly by Remainers that all Brexiteers must be those things (which I'm arrogant enough to think aren't true of me or, for that matter, any other Brexiteer I know).
I see it as part of the worldwide protest against establishment parties in the West at the moment.
It's not so much that Trump stands for change - most of his posturing is just grandstanding.
But I can see positive gains from a Trump presidency and negative losses.
He'll replace Obamacare (why the Repubs are too wimpish to call it by its REAL name, Romneycare, is beyond me) with an even worse system.
He'll probably alienate a lot of allies by his tactlessness.
Teddy Roosevelt said 'speak softly and carry a big stick.'
Trump talks loudly and carries an empty paper bag.
He's irresistibly like the Wizard of Oz or the Emperor with no clothes.
Neither candidate is fit to govern.
Both are a disgrace to themselves and to their country.
Whoever wins will be a disaster.
In a way Clinton was a known evil. Trump is much more of a loose cannon.