|
Post by biglin on Mar 10, 2011 18:58:59 GMT -5
No it isn't. It's eyewitness testimony! You must TRY to stop being so superstitious, Fret! We only have your word for it, bit like your claims about god. Not good enough by a long chalk. Ho v Ha is not superstitious, its factual based on the evidence. If that's superstitious, you're no gypsy. I've given you a fact and just because you prefer not to believe it because it conflicts with your preconceived ideas doesn't make it any less of a fact. Where were you in 1066? How do you know William won the Battle of Hastings? Facts are facts and that's an end of it!' It's being superstitious to prefer theories and prejudices to facts! By the way, miri muj varekai chachimos!
|
|