Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2010 11:08:08 GMT -5
No, the god hypothesis is based on fear. It always has been, and always will be. The God hypothesis has the same status as the Big Bang hypothesis. The Big Bang theory is not a hypothesis. There is evidence to support the Big Bang. There is none to support the existence of "god." Observation and logic combined to produce an hypothesis. It just happens that both the God hypothesis and the BB hypothesis share the same fate of being untestable in principle, and therefore both lack scientific credibility The Big Bang has credibility the "god" hypothesis never will. The former is at least plausible. The latter is not, and never will be. Religious belief is borne and sustained by fear, and only by fear. Take away the fear, and religious belief goes with it.
|
|
|
Post by liberaljoe on Oct 28, 2010 11:52:58 GMT -5
The Big Bang theory is not a hypothesis. There is evidence to support the Big Bang. There is none to support the existence of "god." I repeat, hypotheses do not need evidence; evidence there may be for BB but there is one snag - the evidence can never be ultimately tested Additionally, there is no evidence to support the hypothesis that the Big bang happened out of nothing. Observation and logic combined to produce an hypothesis. It just happens that both the God hypothesis and the BB hypothesis share the same fate of being untestable in principle, and therefore both lack scientific credibility The Big Bang has credibility the "god" hypothesis never will. The former is at least plausible. The latter is not, and never will be. They both share the same flaw. They cannot be proved in principle.Religious belief is borne and sustained by fear, and only by fear. Take away the fear, and religious belief goes with it. Your opinion, not everyone's
|
|