|
Post by fretslider on Jan 9, 2018 4:56:54 GMT -5
There isn't. You probably experienced it, right? You could always make an effort to show us your proof It might be easy for you to Google things, but not for me. I didn't dream it up. It's in there somewhere.!!! There isn't anything to Google. Jumping up and down waving your arms does you no good.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Jan 9, 2018 4:58:22 GMT -5
no its up to you to prove your point......you made the allegation so it's up to you?.....other a A personal experience cannot be verified except by retelling the experience. so you have no proof of space shops and aliens in the bible.. just a reference to Zeke...but nothing else
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jan 9, 2018 9:34:38 GMT -5
I know everything that there is to know about what is classed as normal on this physical plane, but I also know that there are other planes finer than this one, because I have been there. Haven't you heard of the expression: 'as above, so below' what do you suppose this means? You know everything there is to know about what is classed as normal on this physical plane? Then do tell us all about the doppler effect You also know that there are other planes finer than this one, because you have been there? Define a 'finer plane' for us As above, so below is a paraphrase of the second line of the Esmerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistos. Hermes Trismegistus may be a representation of the syncretic combination of the Greek god Hermes and the Egyptian god Thoth. Greeks in Hellenistic Egypt recognised the equivalence of Hermes and Thoth. Consequently, the two gods were worshipped as one, in what had been the Temple of Thoth in Khemnu, which the Greeks called Hermopolis. It has no meaning today for obvious reasons. That's not what I have been led to believe. The Doppler effect is the apparent change of waveIength of any wave motion due to the approach or recession of a whistling train for example. When the train is approaching, more soundwaves per second enters the ear than would be the case if the train was at rest, therefore the note seems higher. When the train begins to recede then the note seems to drop. I believe that each preceding dimension vibrates at a faster rate so is of a finer density. It might even be possible that all dimensions occupy the same space because of this.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jan 9, 2018 10:25:44 GMT -5
A personal experience cannot be verified except by retelling the experience. so you have no proof of space shops and aliens in the bible.. just a reference to Zeke...but nothing else Do you know where every mention of something is to be found in any book?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Jan 9, 2018 15:15:42 GMT -5
so you have no proof of space shops and aliens in the bible.. just a reference to Zeke...but nothing else Do you know where every mention of something is to be found in any book? no but then I wasn't the one who alledged space ships and aliens plural were to be found in the bible .. so not my call
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Jan 10, 2018 5:43:55 GMT -5
You know everything there is to know about what is classed as normal on this physical plane? Then do tell us all about the doppler effect You also know that there are other planes finer than this one, because you have been there? Define a 'finer plane' for us As above, so below is a paraphrase of the second line of the Esmerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistos. Hermes Trismegistus may be a representation of the syncretic combination of the Greek god Hermes and the Egyptian god Thoth. Greeks in Hellenistic Egypt recognised the equivalence of Hermes and Thoth. Consequently, the two gods were worshipped as one, in what had been the Temple of Thoth in Khemnu, which the Greeks called Hermopolis. It has no meaning today for obvious reasons. That's not what I have been led to believe. The Doppler effect is the apparent change of waveIength of any wave motion due to the approach or recession of a whistling train for example. When the train is approaching, more soundwaves per second enters the ear than would be the case if the train was at rest, therefore the note seems higher. When the train begins to recede then the note seems to drop. I believe that each preceding dimension vibrates at a faster rate so is of a finer density. It might even be possible that all dimensions occupy the same space because of this. So, if you can look up the doppler shift, you can provide evidence to back up your arguments, right?
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Jan 10, 2018 5:50:54 GMT -5
That's not what I have been led to believe. The Doppler effect is the apparent change of waveIength of any wave motion due to the approach or recession of a whistling train for example. When the train is approaching, more soundwaves per second enters the ear than would be the case if the train was at rest, therefore the note seems higher. When the train begins to recede then the note seems to drop. I believe that each preceding dimension vibrates at a faster rate so is of a finer density. It might even be possible that all dimensions occupy the same space because of this. So, if you can look up the doppler shift, you can provide evidence to back up your arguments, right? touche and well played Sir....
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jan 10, 2018 11:12:50 GMT -5
That's not what I have been led to believe. The Doppler effect is the apparent change of waveIength of any wave motion due to the approach or recession of a whistling train for example. When the train is approaching, more soundwaves per second enters the ear than would be the case if the train was at rest, therefore the note seems higher. When the train begins to recede then the note seems to drop. I believe that each preceding dimension vibrates at a faster rate so is of a finer density. It might even be possible that all dimensions occupy the same space because of this. So, if you can look up the doppler shift, you can provide evidence to back up your arguments, right? Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence.
|
|
|
Post by men an tol on Jan 10, 2018 15:06:40 GMT -5
So, if you can look up the doppler shift, you can provide evidence to back up your arguments, right? Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. Scottish Lassie posted: “ . . . Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. . . . “ So, if I understand what you are saying, that is, “ . . . A personal experience can be transferred to be used as evidence, but since reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience it cannot be used as evidence. . . . “ ; if that were to be true, then all of Western development is a trash pile of non-experience.
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jan 10, 2018 16:55:21 GMT -5
So, if you can look up the doppler shift, you can provide evidence to back up your arguments, right? touche and well played Sir.... Why use the word Sir when in fact, I am a female. I've evidently made another mistake , you were replying to Fretslider.Sorry.!!!
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jan 10, 2018 17:45:23 GMT -5
Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. Scottish Lassie posted: “ . . . Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. . . . “ So, if I understand what you are saying, that is, “ . . . A personal experience can be transferred to be used as evidence, but since reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience it cannot be used as evidence. . . . “ ; if that were to be true, then all of Western development is a trash pile of non-experience. What I meant was: that everything that you do in this temporal world can be verified. People can own an encyclopedia so can check for themselves, but I can't transfer a personal experience so that it can be used as evidence. I hope I have worded this post better.
|
|
|
Post by men an tol on Jan 10, 2018 18:54:10 GMT -5
Scottish Lassie posted: “ . . . Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. . . . “ So, if I understand what you are saying, that is, “ . . . A personal experience can be transferred to be used as evidence, but since reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience it cannot be used as evidence. . . . “ ; if that were to be true, then all of Western development is a trash pile of non-experience. What I meant was: that everything that you do in this temporal world can be verified. People can own an encyclopedia so can check for themselves, but I can't transfer a personal experience so that it can be used as evidence. I hope I have worded this post better. I believe Scottish Lassie, that everyone here will agree with that posting.
|
|
|
Post by fretslider on Jan 11, 2018 4:32:46 GMT -5
So, if you can look up the doppler shift, you can provide evidence to back up your arguments, right? Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. Patent nonsense. An encyclopedia is a repository of human knowledge. Science doesn't do personal experience, it does hard evidence. You clearly can't cope with that.
|
|
|
Post by mouse on Jan 11, 2018 4:49:39 GMT -5
Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. Scottish Lassie posted: “ . . . Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. . . . “ So, if I understand what you are saying, that is, “ . . . A personal experience can be transferred to be used as evidence, but since reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience it cannot be used as evidence. . . . “ ; if that were to be true, then all of Western development is a trash pile of non-experience. we really are in Alice in wonderland now... ..oh my ears and whiskers
|
|
|
Post by Scottish Lassie on Jan 11, 2018 8:10:22 GMT -5
Reading an encyclopedia is not a personal experience which can be transferred to be used as evidence. Patent nonsense. An encyclopedia is a repository of human knowledge. Science doesn't do personal experience, it does hard evidence. You clearly can't cope with that. I know what an encyclopaedia is and also a personal experience, but as men an tol pointed out, everything that we do, is an experience. I opened the book in order to answer your question more clearly. Why quibble?
|
|